<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Vagary.TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vagary.tv/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vagary.tv</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PC Review: Illyriad by GM Luna</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/15673/comment-page-1#comment-4518</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=15673#comment-4518</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your feedback, everyone! We do agree that the mobile experience could be improved. 

GM Luna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your feedback, everyone! We do agree that the mobile experience could be improved. </p>
<p>GM Luna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just In Bailey: Let&#8217;s All Go to the Movies by J. W. Goodson</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16398/comment-page-1#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator>J. W. Goodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16398#comment-4517</guid>
		<description>Hey now. I for one enjoyed the SMB movie! Well, I was 8 years old or something at the time, so it was Mario and that&#039;s all that mattered. =p

As for Mark Wahlberg...I like his movies, I do. But as Nathan Drake? No thanks! I prefer Nathan Fillion for that role personally.

Overall, though, I agree that Hollywood needs to allow game movies to stand on their own instead of trying so hard to butcher what makes the game so great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey now. I for one enjoyed the SMB movie! Well, I was 8 years old or something at the time, so it was Mario and that&#8217;s all that mattered. =p</p>
<p>As for Mark Wahlberg&#8230;I like his movies, I do. But as Nathan Drake? No thanks! I prefer Nathan Fillion for that role personally.</p>
<p>Overall, though, I agree that Hollywood needs to allow game movies to stand on their own instead of trying so hard to butcher what makes the game so great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just In Bailey: Let&#8217;s All Go to the Movies by Joey Alesia</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16398/comment-page-1#comment-4516</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Alesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16398#comment-4516</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a lot of love out there Marky Mark it seems.  My problem with him is most films he&#039;s in that are lauded as great movies have other actors carrying him.  I never saw The Fighter, but I do recall Christian Bale winning an award.  And The Departed, well I don&#039;t won&#039;t to get into how many other stars are in that movie.  And I don&#039;t want to go into my opinion of the Academy and who they nominate.  That&#039;s not the point of the article.  My reason behind citing FF VII: AC and RE: Degeneration as great examples of movies based on games was because that is exactly what they were.  I don&#039;t think they&#039;re award worthy at all.  I think they did what any movie based on a video game should do.  They respected the core material and didn&#039;t try to change what it was.  If you recall from my previous article, I don&#039;t think FFVII&#039;s story is that good to begin with.  And Resident Evil is campy horror.  Why Hollywood would feel the need to change that is what I disagree with.  That is when things become a disaster (i.e. Super Mario Bros.).  And I do have to ask, how many sites and petitions out there wanted to rid the world of Mark Wahlberg playing Nathan Drake?  It&#039;s cool that there&#039;s disagreement.  That&#039;s the beauty of opinions.  But I think my point was kind of missed.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of love out there Marky Mark it seems.  My problem with him is most films he&#8217;s in that are lauded as great movies have other actors carrying him.  I never saw The Fighter, but I do recall Christian Bale winning an award.  And The Departed, well I don&#8217;t won&#8217;t to get into how many other stars are in that movie.  And I don&#8217;t want to go into my opinion of the Academy and who they nominate.  That&#8217;s not the point of the article.  My reason behind citing FF VII: AC and RE: Degeneration as great examples of movies based on games was because that is exactly what they were.  I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re award worthy at all.  I think they did what any movie based on a video game should do.  They respected the core material and didn&#8217;t try to change what it was.  If you recall from my previous article, I don&#8217;t think FFVII&#8217;s story is that good to begin with.  And Resident Evil is campy horror.  Why Hollywood would feel the need to change that is what I disagree with.  That is when things become a disaster (i.e. Super Mario Bros.).  And I do have to ask, how many sites and petitions out there wanted to rid the world of Mark Wahlberg playing Nathan Drake?  It&#8217;s cool that there&#8217;s disagreement.  That&#8217;s the beauty of opinions.  But I think my point was kind of missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just In Bailey: Let&#8217;s All Go to the Movies by Schchrh</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16398/comment-page-1#comment-4515</link>
		<dc:creator>Schchrh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16398#comment-4515</guid>
		<description>Joe, I have to disagree with the Mark W. comment. He has been doing well in his recent roles. That said, I am best suited for that role. I appreciate that you pointed out RE Degeneration. I would agree that this was an attempt to appease the gamers however, it lacked the reality that actors and great CGI can bring to a movie experience, i.e. Avatar, Immortals, 300, and so on. (Not that I am judging the movies for being great or not, but the quality of the CGI incorporated with real actors was amazing and necessary to please gamers)

I recently came across an article that made me look into the RE movies. The article was about the delay/cancellation of the Bioshock Movie. The article was about the disagreement between the creators of the game and the movie producers. Hollywood, as they are most of the time, were looking for the biggest financial return and not to make great art. They wanted a PG13 rating or the movie was off. The reason for this is the fact that a whole additional demographic of people could then go buy tickets and experience the movie. Notice I didn&#039;t write &quot;enjoy the movie&quot;. 

I believe the producers of the game said something along the lines of (Bioshock deserves the freedom that comes along with an R rating and PG13 is not acceptable). This is when I looked into the RE movies. I thought &quot;surely these movies must be PG13, how could these pieces of crap get made, and cleared, by Hollywood without the additional revenue from those under 16. (is it 16? it has been so long since I have had to worry about that). Guess what, rated R! So how is it that Bioshock doesn&#039;t get the go ahead? I feel like that would have a huge turnout. 

OK, back from my tangent. Great article! I agree that something has to be done with games to movies and even movies to games. I am encouraged that the creators of Bioshock are looking to make great art and not necessarily great profits. (though, if it is done corretly, they will make both). 

Your buddy

Schmidty </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, I have to disagree with the Mark W. comment. He has been doing well in his recent roles. That said, I am best suited for that role. I appreciate that you pointed out RE Degeneration. I would agree that this was an attempt to appease the gamers however, it lacked the reality that actors and great CGI can bring to a movie experience, i.e. Avatar, Immortals, 300, and so on. (Not that I am judging the movies for being great or not, but the quality of the CGI incorporated with real actors was amazing and necessary to please gamers)</p>
<p>I recently came across an article that made me look into the RE movies. The article was about the delay/cancellation of the Bioshock Movie. The article was about the disagreement between the creators of the game and the movie producers. Hollywood, as they are most of the time, were looking for the biggest financial return and not to make great art. They wanted a PG13 rating or the movie was off. The reason for this is the fact that a whole additional demographic of people could then go buy tickets and experience the movie. Notice I didn&#8217;t write &#8220;enjoy the movie&#8221;. </p>
<p>I believe the producers of the game said something along the lines of (Bioshock deserves the freedom that comes along with an R rating and PG13 is not acceptable). This is when I looked into the RE movies. I thought &#8220;surely these movies must be PG13, how could these pieces of crap get made, and cleared, by Hollywood without the additional revenue from those under 16. (is it 16? it has been so long since I have had to worry about that). Guess what, rated R! So how is it that Bioshock doesn&#8217;t get the go ahead? I feel like that would have a huge turnout. </p>
<p>OK, back from my tangent. Great article! I agree that something has to be done with games to movies and even movies to games. I am encouraged that the creators of Bioshock are looking to make great art and not necessarily great profits. (though, if it is done corretly, they will make both). </p>
<p>Your buddy</p>
<p>Schmidty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just In Bailey: Let&#8217;s All Go to the Movies by Chris Scott</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16398/comment-page-1#comment-4514</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16398#comment-4514</guid>
		<description>&quot;You could cast a dummy made entirely out of straw and it would have more acting talent than Marky Mark.&quot; 

You don&#039;t watch many movies do you? While it is certainly fair to question how well Wahlberg would have done as Nathan Drake, it is a pretty egregious offense to suggest that a dummy made of straw has more acting talent than someone that was nominated for an Academy Award in an acting role. In the proper role and under the proper direction, Wahlberg is actually quite a solid actor and his filmography has some outstanding movies with outstanding performances by him scattered throughout it.

And really? Resident Evil: Degeneration and Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children are good examples of video game films? Seriously? You aren&#039;t being facetious there? Advent Children is basically a 100 minute cut scene, and as much as I love Square&#039;s animation, the plot and acting in the film is atrocious. The same could be said about Degeneration, with slightly lower quality animation.

Aside from that I disagree with pretty much every point you&#039;ve made here, although I do agree that people making game movies should at least have an idea of what makes the games worthy of turning into a film. 

I think the problem with video game movies is that the filmmakers are trying to please everyone. Instead of just setting out to make a good movie they are trying to please fans of the game and appeal to a mass market audience. Are there good stories to tell in the film medium that originated as video games? Sure there are. But a lot of what makes games great as a storytelling medium is the interactivity and films don&#039;t have that. It is going to take better writers, better actors and better directors to coax those stories into actually good films. It is not just a matter of giving video game fans what they want, because what we want isn&#039;t a good movie, its a good game. A movie needs to appeal to more than just those fans and it needs to do so via well thought out adaptation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You could cast a dummy made entirely out of straw and it would have more acting talent than Marky Mark.&#8221; </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t watch many movies do you? While it is certainly fair to question how well Wahlberg would have done as Nathan Drake, it is a pretty egregious offense to suggest that a dummy made of straw has more acting talent than someone that was nominated for an Academy Award in an acting role. In the proper role and under the proper direction, Wahlberg is actually quite a solid actor and his filmography has some outstanding movies with outstanding performances by him scattered throughout it.</p>
<p>And really? Resident Evil: Degeneration and Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children are good examples of video game films? Seriously? You aren&#8217;t being facetious there? Advent Children is basically a 100 minute cut scene, and as much as I love Square&#8217;s animation, the plot and acting in the film is atrocious. The same could be said about Degeneration, with slightly lower quality animation.</p>
<p>Aside from that I disagree with pretty much every point you&#8217;ve made here, although I do agree that people making game movies should at least have an idea of what makes the games worthy of turning into a film. </p>
<p>I think the problem with video game movies is that the filmmakers are trying to please everyone. Instead of just setting out to make a good movie they are trying to please fans of the game and appeal to a mass market audience. Are there good stories to tell in the film medium that originated as video games? Sure there are. But a lot of what makes games great as a storytelling medium is the interactivity and films don&#8217;t have that. It is going to take better writers, better actors and better directors to coax those stories into actually good films. It is not just a matter of giving video game fans what they want, because what we want isn&#8217;t a good movie, its a good game. A movie needs to appeal to more than just those fans and it needs to do so via well thought out adaptation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s Up With Vagary #3 by J. W. Goodson</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16371/comment-page-1#comment-4513</link>
		<dc:creator>J. W. Goodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16371#comment-4513</guid>
		<description>Fully agreed. Amalur rocks...Don is just a troll. =p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully agreed. Amalur rocks&#8230;Don is just a troll. =p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DLC Review: Lightning and Master Sergeant Amodar Battle by Chris Troll</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16257/comment-page-1#comment-4512</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16257#comment-4512</guid>
		<description>$3 for 25 minutes worth of content. Yeah... that seems worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$3 for 25 minutes worth of content. Yeah&#8230; that seems worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What’s Up With Vagary #3 by Chris Troll</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16371/comment-page-1#comment-4511</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16371#comment-4511</guid>
		<description>And Don continues his obvious trend of being absolutely wrong. 

Oh and Tony does suck at games, all of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Don continues his obvious trend of being absolutely wrong. </p>
<p>Oh and Tony does suck at games, all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Second Opinion: Final Fantasy XIII-2 by Chris Troll</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16139/comment-page-1#comment-4510</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16139#comment-4510</guid>
		<description>This article is almost as bad as the actual review written by that crazy guy Don. XIII-2 is a 1, at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is almost as bad as the actual review written by that crazy guy Don. XIII-2 is a 1, at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Final Fantasy XIII-2 by Sarc</title>
		<link>http://vagary.tv/archives/16049/comment-page-1#comment-4509</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vagary.tv/?p=16049#comment-4509</guid>
		<description>agree with the overall review - 4/5 for a normal game. but my expectations for a final fantasy game are higher, i say its a 2.5/5 for a square enix.  A 5/5 being FF7 or FF6. 

major problem with the casino, slots are TOTALLY lame.  chocobo races are ok as a form of gambling, but the actual chocobo racing basically sucks. 

I feel the gate system was a weird, unnecessary imposition into the FF13 world.  IMO they used them as a story mechanism so they could slap DLC for sazh/fang/vanille/snow/casino onto the game.  the complete absence of fal&#039;cie and new l&#039;cie is also weird... like... really ? They had SO much they couldve done using a time travel system to visit the time when fal&#039;cie were active and the original war with cocoon, why avoid it???  gah.  just so much wasted potential. 

anyway, agreed that I think this is an honest review, well done. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree with the overall review &#8211; 4/5 for a normal game. but my expectations for a final fantasy game are higher, i say its a 2.5/5 for a square enix.  A 5/5 being FF7 or FF6. </p>
<p>major problem with the casino, slots are TOTALLY lame.  chocobo races are ok as a form of gambling, but the actual chocobo racing basically sucks. </p>
<p>I feel the gate system was a weird, unnecessary imposition into the FF13 world.  IMO they used them as a story mechanism so they could slap DLC for sazh/fang/vanille/snow/casino onto the game.  the complete absence of fal&#8217;cie and new l&#8217;cie is also weird&#8230; like&#8230; really ? They had SO much they couldve done using a time travel system to visit the time when fal&#8217;cie were active and the original war with cocoon, why avoid it???  gah.  just so much wasted potential. </p>
<p>anyway, agreed that I think this is an honest review, well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

